Re: Backup interface command under frame relay subinterface?

From: Private Ryan (pv.ryan@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 23 2005 - 16:21:31 GMT-3

I think it should be placed in physical interface as backup command
will keep checking for the physical down status on the interface.
Correct me if I say something wrong.

Ryan

2005/9/24, charlie@hanaro.com <charlie@hanaro.com>:
> Hello,
>
>
> &nbsp;
>
>
> R1#sh run int s 0/0
>
>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; no ip addr
>
>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;encap frame-relay
>
>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; no frame-relay inv
>
>
> &nbsp;
>
>
> R1#sh run int s 0/0.1 multipoint
>
>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ip addr 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>
>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 102 broad
>
>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.3 103 broad
>
>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;no frame-relay inv
>
>
> ========================
>
>
> &nbsp;If I need to apply "backup interface bri 0/0" command for isdn backup,
>
>
>
> &nbsp;which one is better place? int s 0/0 ?&nbsp;&nbsp; or&nbsp; int s 0/0.1
> ?
>
>
> &nbsp;
>
>
> Thank you in advance.&nbsp;
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:16 GMT-3