From: Holmes (iamholmes@eml.cc)
Date: Fri Sep 23 2005 - 02:52:42 GMT-3
This is with reference to Doyle's Vol 1, pg 592. I've included
details (a diagram, config and routing tables) at the end of
this mail. Now what I don't understand is, why does
Bumble have the following route :
R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.2.2,
Since we have done mutual redistribution, shouldn't we have an
'O E2' route (as in fact Grimwig has), instead of this R route ?
My logic being, that since we have done mutual redistribution,
there is both an OSPF and a RIP route to 192.168.1.0.
(We have a /24 route throughout this network). Since longest
prefix doesn't come into the picture, shouldn't the lower AD OSPF
192.168.1.0 route be the preferred route in the routing table ?
Diagram and relevant details follow :
4.0
Blathers------------Duff
| |
| |
| 3.0 | 5.0
| OSPF |
| |
| |
- -Bumble- - - - -Grimwig- - -
| |
| |
| 2.0 RIP | 6.0
| |
| |
Monks -------------+
|
| 1.0
|
-- Holmes iamholmes@eml.cc-- http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:16 GMT-3