From: Jens Petter Eikeland (jenseike@start.no)
Date: Tue Sep 20 2005 - 07:00:41 GMT-3
Hey..
Thanks, that will do it then..
I have yet another Q. r1 should only learn routes from r1 if lo1 is up. I
guess this is some kind of conditional routing,
But I don't know how to configure..
Jens
_____
Fra: Niche [mailto:jackyliu419@gmail.com]
Sendt: 20. september 2005 11:54
Til: Jens Petter Eikeland
Kopi: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Emne: Re: bgp route-reflector issue
Yes, you can make R1 as a route-reflector for sw1. And in fact, if my memory
still serve, and please someone point out if I am wrong..
If you don't set R1 as route-reflector for sw1 (which I assume sw is alot
inside the same AS), sw1 won't receive the route from R1.
It's because if you only set R1 as a route-reflector-client of R5, all R5
route will only advertise 1 more hope further into the local AS if that
receiver is a same AS RR-client. But I can't 100% confirm this..
Another solution will be make R1 become a normal iBGP peer to R5.
Cheers~
Jacky
On 9/20/05, Jens Petter Eikeland <jenseike@start.no> wrote:
Hi group..
I am trying to get something to wor, bu tare unsure of what exactly to do..
This is the toplology :
Switch1--------r1--------r5-----------r2
|
|
R4
R1, r2,r4 and r5 is in a frame-relay nbma network. All the routers form a
single AS. I would guess that the normal thing here would be to
set r5 as route-reflector. But Switch 1 have to been reach from the network
by using bgp only.. so my question is. If I make r5 RR for r1, r2
and r4. Can I also then make r1 as route-reflector for switch1. Would this
be a scenario that is good to configure, or is there some other solution
that would be a better solution..
Thanks
Jens P
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:15 GMT-3