From: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com
Date: Mon Sep 19 2005 - 10:24:00 GMT-3
The problem I ran into was never solved per requirement . I rebooted the
devices and started from a fresh configuration and still no luck. If I
would
have just got it to work I would have lost the points on that section but
gotten points in later sections because I would have had connectivity, but
if I left the required configuration in I would have lost those points plus
later points.
"Exceeding Client Expectations"
Lee Donald
<Lee.Donald@t-sys
tems.co.uk> To
Sent by: Ralph <Mandela@myrealbox.com>,
nobody@groupstudy ccielab@groupstudy.com
.com cc
Subject
09/19/2005 09:13 RE: RE : Encap Failed "Router on a
AM Stick"
Please respond to
Lee Donald
<Lee.Donald@t-sys
tems.co.uk>
Ralph,
I have pondered the same question many times and the think the answer is as
follows, by the time you get into the lab you should have come across most
of the bugs and be able to spot them so you can reload the box very
quickly.
For instance if you are in the middle of configuring a route-map, and you
type " set ip next hop ", something you know is a correct command inside a
route-map, the router says " wrong agument/ invalid syntax" reload straight
away, it's a bug.
It may not be very fair but that's how it is.
Regards
Lee.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph [mailto:Mandela@myrealbox.com]
Sent: 19 September 2005 14:00
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE : Encap Failed "Router on a Stick"
Guys:
I'm just wondering what is the recommended approach to resolving issues
like
in the LAB. Do we need to inform the Proctor about what we suspect to be a
bug in the IOS? what about the time wasted trying to troubleshoot a
bug-related problem, will lost time be credited back? How are issues like
this generally taken care of? What about the real victim of this problem -
the candidate - the induced psychological stress this may have caused
him/her. Is it okay to just move on to the next TASK, what if the buggy
task
is a core task? There has to be a formal procedure in place to resolve
problems like this, that will hopefully(?), be fair to all parties
concerned.
Just wondering!
Ralph.
From: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com < Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com>
Date: Sep 19, 2005 7:19 AM
Subject: RE : Encap Failed "Router on a Stick"
To: Richard Dumoulin <Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr >
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com, Lee Donald <Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk>
I removed the native reference on both R6 and the SW1 and I was able to
ping to and from R6 now. Is this a version bug?
Making the native vlan 263 was actually the requirement and the
configuration I posted was the actual solution, which was demonstrated to
work.
Thanks everyone.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:15 GMT-3