RE : Encap Failed "Router on a Stick"

From: Richard Dumoulin (Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr)
Date: Mon Sep 19 2005 - 08:12:01 GMT-3


I agree. I believe Bruce Caslow mentioned this bug was due to an issue with
the interface controller not bein gable to handle the native vlan,

-- Richard

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Lee Donald [mailto:Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk]
Envoyi : lundi 19 septembre 2005 12:42
@ : Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com; Lee Donald
Cc : ccielab@groupstudy.com
Objet : RE: Encap Failed "Router on a Stick"

Bill,

I would remove the native function you currently have on. Frames in the
native vlan are not tagged and hence when they get sent across the trunk, R6
doesn't know which vlan to forward them on.

Try that.

Regards

Lee.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com [mailto:Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com]
Sent: 19 September 2005 11:32
To: Lee Donald
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Encap Failed "Router on a Stick"

Yes, I guess that information might be helpful.

I'm ping from R2 (204.12.1.2) on the same ethernet segment to
R6(204.12.1.6) There is also BB3(204.12.1.254) on the same segment which I
can ping to just fine from R2. I can't ping to or from R6 unless I remove
the subinterfaces and put the IP address on the physical interface and just
make the switch port an access port in Vlan 263 (same as R2)

                                                                             
           Lee Donald
<Lee.Donald@t-sys
tems.co.uk> To
Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com, 09/19/2005 06:31
ccielab@groupstudy.com AM
cc
Subject RE: Encap Failed "Router on a
Stick"

Bill,

Exactly where are you pinging to and from ?

Regards

Lee.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com [mailto:Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com]
Sent: 19 September 2005 11:18
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Encap Failed "Router on a Stick"

I'm having some problems getting this configuration to work. I can't figure
out why on a debug ip packet detail, when I ping to or from this I get
encapsulation failed. When I delete the subinterfaces and assign the IP
address to the physical interface and put the switchport in vlan 263, it is
successful. After staring at my configuration for an hour , I can't see
anything wrong with it. Can someone verify this?

Switch1:
interface FastEthernet0/6
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
 switchport trunk native vlan 263
 switchport mode trunk

R6:
interface Ethernet0/0
 no ip address
 half-duplex
!
interface Ethernet0/0.6
 encapsulation dot1Q 6
 ip address 163.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
 no cdp enable
!
interface Ethernet0/0.263
 encapsulation dot1Q 263 native
 ip address 204.12.1.6 255.255.255.0
 no cdp enable

Thanks in advance,
Bill



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:15 GMT-3