From: joshua lauer (jslauer@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Sep 18 2005 - 13:43:11 GMT-3
That's when to talk to the proctor,
I think this is a valid question, I would also ask myself if there was a
requirement for those bgp prefix's to be reachable. If not, then you dont
need to redistribute...if so, then redistribution or tunneling would be a
valid solution, depending on your particular scenario requirements...I would
always verify with the proctor though, no need in making things more complex
when you dont need too.
jl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Venkataramanaiah.R" <vramanaiah@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: BGP Sync question
> Hi Folks,
>
> Assuming if we face a scenario in the real exam, where BGP does not run on
> all the routers in the Pod, We normally tend to only verify the routing
> tables on the BGP Speakers, which will anyway have those routes. Often, we
> overlook the fact that the non BGP speakers in the Pod do not know these
> routes and they may black hole the traffic to these destinations.
>
> So my question is, altough the section does not explicitly ask you to do
> that, are we expected to redistribute those BGP routes into IGP (with
> appro.
> filters) so that the whole network is aware of the BGP routes
>
> TIA
> -Venkat
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:15 GMT-3