llq bandwidth is based on?

From: Quetta Walla (quetta_1@lycos.com)
Date: Sun Sep 18 2005 - 07:03:50 GMT-3


My questions are below the following example:

class-map voice
match access-group 101
!
class-map immediate-data
match access-group 102
!
class-map priority-data
match access-group 103
 !
access-list 101 permit udp any any range 16384 32767
access-list 102 permit ip any any precedence immediate
access-list 103 permit ip any any precedence priority
!
policy-map mypolicy
class voice
priority 16
class immediate-data
bandwidth 32
class priority-data
bandwidth 16
class class-default
fair-queue 64
queue-limit 20
!
map-class frame-relay fragment
  frame-relay cir 64000
  frame-relay mincir 64000
frame-relay bc 640
frame-relay fragment 50
  service-policy output mypolicy

Question 1: Do we always need to have fair-queue in class-default when ever llq is configured, any rule for that. I know one rule is that if we have random-detect configured, then we either need bandwidth command in that class or fair-queue in class-defaul. But in the above example we do not have random-detect.

Question 2: For llq, we have priority 16, or we could have prority percent 50, these values are based on mincir value configured in map-class frame-relay. A. But what if mincir and cir are not there? B. What if they are not configured for FRTS, if htey are for Ehternet interface, then are these priority 16 or priority 50 values based on that interface which has 75% available and configurable thru max-reserved-bandwidth
interface command if our total is more than 75%, right?

Question 3: if we just say bandwidth xxxx under a class, how is this different than police xxxx.

-- 


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:15 GMT-3