RE: Question on Linux network bonding and Cat 2950 cfg

From: Muhammad Asif (masif1c383@rogers.com)
Date: Wed Sep 14 2005 - 19:22:06 GMT-3

• Next message: Ali.Huang: "bgp route couldn't be loaded"
• Previous message: Bhalchandra Nevaskar: "Pl. remove me from the list...thx"
• Maybe in reply to: John Smith: "Question on Linux network bonding and Cat 2950 cfg"
• Next in thread: John Smith: "RE: Question on Linux network bonding and Cat 2950 cfg"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I am no expert in Linux, but the example in the URL that you give, has a
single IP address configured for all the interfaces along with the bonded
interface, where as you are asking to have 192.168.20.104, 105, 106 and 107
IPs?

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of John
Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 5:43 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Question on Linux network bonding and Cat 2950 cfg

I'm having some issues putting knowledge into practical use.

If I have a linux server and want to do network bonding on it ( 4 nic's ),
lets say I have a 192.168.20.104, 105, 106 and 107 as IP's. What do I have
to on the Cat to support this?

Here's a link on network bonding...

http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/15280.html

Anyone have any thoughts?

Many Thanks.

• Next message: Ali.Huang: "bgp route couldn't be loaded"
• Previous message: Bhalchandra Nevaskar: "Pl. remove me from the list...thx"
• Maybe in reply to: John Smith: "Question on Linux network bonding and Cat 2950 cfg"
• Next in thread: John Smith: "RE: Question on Linux network bonding and Cat 2950 cfg"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:15 GMT-3