From: James Ventre (messageboard@ventrefamily.com)
Date: Tue Sep 13 2005 - 18:55:31 GMT-3
OK. I must have misread your email about the requirements. I thought it
said loadbalance across 2 trunks - not necessarily load balance on a
PerVLAN basis.
James
Anthony Sequeira wrote:
EtherChannel will not let us load balance on a VLAN by VLAN basis I do not
believe.
For example, we want VLANs 10 and 40 to go across Trunk 1 and VLANs 20 and
30 to go across Trunk 2.
On 9/13/05, James Ventre <messageboard@ventrefamily.com> wrote:
Is there another way to control load balancing across trunk links beyond
port cost and port priority? I think not.....
EtherChannel?
James
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:15 GMT-3