From: Anthony Sequeira (terry.francona@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 12 2005 - 15:48:43 GMT-3
Wow - this is an intersting post to me.
First of all - we can use Auto-RP and sparse-mode together. We are not
required to use sparse-dense just because we are using Auto-RP. I just
wanted to make that clear before I got myself even more confused.....
Now - if we are told we have to use sparse-dense - and we are told to NEVER
go into dense mode.......this is interesting.....I am thinking there are
several options.....but.......I have never heard of the command "no ip pim
dm-fallback" you mention here. Can you send me a link to that command?
On 9/12/05, Schulz, Dave <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
>
> If there is a requirement that requires you to use Auto-RP, which means
> using sparse-dense mode. And, another requirement to insure that you
> never go into dense mode.....is it more correct to:
>
> 1. Use the command - "no ip pim dm-fallback"
>
> Or,
>
> 2. Use the "sink RP" configuration that cisco details in the
> following white-paper.....
>
> http://cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk828/technologies_white_paper09186a00800d6b
> 63.shtml
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Dave Schulz
> Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com <mailto:dschulz@dpsciences.com >
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:14 GMT-3