From: kumara.shunmugam@wipro.com
Date: Mon Sep 12 2005 - 10:33:46 GMT-3
I think this is an interesting topic. I have also observed the same some time back and forgot... In fact the post made me to remember this!.
As usual, any comments from experts on this? Why such behavior?
Regards
Shunmugam
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Jens Petter Eikeland
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 5:30 AM
To: 'Ali.Huang'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: SV: redistribution between eigrp and ospf
hi
This is a default behaviour when you do redistributed connected and the
other routing protocol also by default do redistributed connected. I dont
remember exactly
what is happening, but you need to lover the AD of ospf to below EIGRP
protocol on all interfaces
Router ospf 1
distance 85
There is one more way to solve this, but I do not exactly remember how. I
think you need to redistribute that Ethernet interface in again somhow.
Jens Petter Eikeland
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] Pe vegne av
Ali.Huang
Sendt: 12. september 2005 13:35
Til: Cisco certification
Emne: redistribution between eigrp and ospf
hi,group,
Topo:R1---ospf-----(s0)R2(e0)---eigrp
I do bi-direction redistribution.work well.and the subnet of e0 was
diaplayed in R1 routing table.But when I want to redistribute loopback0 of
R2 into ospf domain,use the following clauses;
route-map CON permit 10
match interface Loopback0
router ospf 10
redistribute connected metric-type 1 metric 100 subnets route-map CON
The subnet of e0 disappeares from R1 routing table,and the loopback0 of R2
OK.If removes the redistribute connected,OK.it come back.who can tell me
why?
THX.
Ali.huang
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:14 GMT-3