Re: Re: Tunneling over OSPF

From: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp
Date: Wed Sep 07 2005 - 00:11:17 GMT-3

• Next message: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp: "Re: Re: advertise a BGP aggregated prefix only without summary"
• Previous message: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp: "Re: RE: match protocol http url"
• Maybe in reply to: Dillon Yang: "Re: Tunneling over OSPF"
• Next in thread: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp: "Re: Re: Re: Tunneling over OSPF"
• Maybe reply: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp: "Re: Re: Re: Tunneling over OSPF"
• Maybe reply: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp: "Re: Re: Re: Tunneling over OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Dillon Yang: "Re: Re: Re: Tunneling over OSPF"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dillon,

Thanks.

Your posting is very helpful.

Between R3-R6s VL is a redundancy for the case that R6 loses area5.
In such any cases, I always create another VL for redundancy.

Without a requirement on real Lab, this my habbit is not good?
Or case-by-case?

KY

• Next message: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp: "Re: Re: advertise a BGP aggregated prefix only without summary"
• Previous message: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp: "Re: RE: match protocol http url"
• Maybe in reply to: Dillon Yang: "Re: Tunneling over OSPF"
• Next in thread: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp: "Re: Re: Re: Tunneling over OSPF"
• Maybe reply: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp: "Re: Re: Re: Tunneling over OSPF"
• Maybe reply: nhqky888@ybb.ne.jp: "Re: Re: Re: Tunneling over OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Dillon Yang: "Re: Re: Re: Tunneling over OSPF"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:14 GMT-3