CB-Policing

From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 - 14:55:36 GMT-3

• Next message: Chris Lewis \(chrlewis\): "RE: bandwidth remaining percentage"
• Previous message: Edwards, Andrew M: "RE: bandwidth remaining percentage"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This test is about changing the value of Be on CB-Policing.
It confirms that when violate-action is not specified, it does not matter if Be has a value or not, it is not used, although IOS shows the Be.

It is related to a previous discussion.

When the violate-action is not specified:

be=7000

!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

be=64000

!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Same drop rate.

when the violate-action is specified:

be=7000

!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

be=64000
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

When violate-action is not specified, anything above Bc exceeds.

So, if the task requires Be, it is necessary to configure the keyword violate-action, otherwise it will be there, but no effect.

Any comments appreciated.

• Next message: Chris Lewis \(chrlewis\): "RE: bandwidth remaining percentage"
• Previous message: Edwards, Andrew M: "RE: bandwidth remaining percentage"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:14 GMT-3