RE: Re: How to guarantee the latency

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Sep 05 2005 - 00:33:12 GMT-3


I believe that command has gone away in favor of the "queue-limit" command.

Scott

PS. Your mileage may vary based on release you're using.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of John
Matus
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 10:53 PM
To: gladston@br.ibm.com; lab
Subject: Re: Re: How to guarantee the latency

opps...i meant "shape max-buffers". i didn't have a router in front of me

Regards,

John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net
----- Original Message -----
From: <gladston@br.ibm.com>
To: <jmatus@pacbell.net>
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Re: How to guarantee the latency

> John,
>
> Could you tell us what version do you used?
>
> ==============
> quoted
>
> policy-map shape
> class shape
> shape average 56
> shape holdq 640
> ==============
>
> I could not find 'shape holdq':
>
> Rack2R2(config-pmap-c)#shape ?
> adaptive Enable Traffic Shaping adaptation to BECN
> average configure token bucket: CIR (bps) [Bc (bits) [Be
> (bits)]],
> send out Bc only per interval
> fecn-adapt Enable Traffic Shaping reflection of FECN as BECN
> fr-voice-adapt Enable rate adjustment depending on voice presence
> max-buffers Set Maximum Buffer Limit
> peak configure token bucket: CIR (bps) [Bc (bits) [Be
> (bits)]],
> send out Bc+Be per interval
>
>
> Version tested is:
>
> C3640-JS-M, Version 12.2(15)T14



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:14 GMT-3