From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sat Sep 03 2005 - 22:12:51 GMT-3
You are correct in your opinion. Different groups, different thoughts of
operation...
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Zouta oxpf
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 3:26 PM
To: Imal kalutotage
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: ip pim auto rp listner
Imal,
I thought the auto listener feature was just designed for auto-rp groups
224.0.1.39 <http://224.0.1.39> and 224.0.1.40 <http://224.0.1.40>. It allows
the routers to treat these groups silently as dense mode groups.
BSR, on the other hand, uses a combination of unicast and multicast. BSR
sends BSR messages to all pim routers at 224.0.0.13 <http://224.0.0.13> with
a TTL = 1, similar to ospf (well, the address is link-scoped)
In my opinion, I do not think the command is needed with BSR. But then this
opinion is subject to serious scrutiny.
Regards
Z
On 9/3/05, Imal kalutotage <imal.kalutotage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
> I need to clarify the following..
> if we are only allowed to use sparse-mode, we need to use 'ip pim auto
> rp listner"
> in case we use auto rp for rp election..{Pls correct me if I am wrong}
> Do we have to use the same command, if we have to use BSR instead of
> Auto-rp?
> Cheers,
> Imal
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:14 GMT-3