From: Chris Lewis \(chrlewis\) (chrlewis@cisco.com)
Date: Fri Sep 02 2005 - 21:05:46 GMT-3
That's a good way to look at it. I would add the following:
With IRB, you turn what are normally layer 3 router ports in to layer 2
ports by issuing the no ip address configuration.
By contrast, with fallback brifging, you turn what are normally layer 2
ports in to layer 3 ports by the no switchport configuration.
For IRB you use bridge 1 protocol ieee, for fallback bridging you use
bridge 1 protocol vlan-bridge
For IRB you tie router interfaces or BVIs together with the bridge-group
X command
For fallback bridging you tie routed interfaces or SVIs together with
bridge-group X
I do not have a switch to hand right now, but I'm not sure the link you
provide gives a completely accurate config for this feature. I'll try to
send you a working config next week.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 3:30 PM
To: 'Stefan Grey'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Fallback bridging
I think of fallback bridging as something similar to irb but for
switches.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Stefan Grey
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 4:09 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Fallback bridging
Hello group,
Could anybody explain shortly what this technology does or give some
links where I could read something about it.
If found this link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps646/products_configura
tion
_guide_chapter09186a008014f345.html
But absolutely didn't understand. Thank you in advance.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:13 GMT-3