From: Keane, James (James.Keane@agriculture.gov.ie)
Date: Mon Aug 29 2005 - 11:46:44 GMT-3
I failed 3 times and I have to say, on reflection while the third time I thought I had a good chance of passing, I didnt attempt about 10-15%. The last time I only left 3% go, so I felt I nailed it.
I dont think their is a conspiracy out there, but it is human nature to only learn as much as you have to, so it takes some of us humans a couple of fails to realise that you have to know all the subjects on the blueprint to pass!
There are no short-cuts, no cheat sheets, no brain dumps, in the end you have to go in and physically program the routers, that is why the qualification is so valuable.
So while we may groan we all eventually fill the knowledge gaps and pass !
On the subject of prefix-list or access-list its my understanding that unless the question specifies otherwise you can use any method to solve the question but you can always ask the proctor on the day... thats what he is there for !
-----Original Message-----
From: cciein2006@yahoo.com [mailto:cciein2006@yahoo.com]
Sent: 29 August 2005 15:25
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RE: Three Test Minimum?
Yeah but isn't the grading subjective? If one proctor prefers prefix lists while another prefers distribute lists couldn't the reason you failed be because you happened to catch the wrong proctor?
Does your grade get double checked by another proctor?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:20 GMT-3