From: nenad pudar (nenad.pudar@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Aug 28 2005 - 16:01:17 GMT-3
Nothing changes if summary 0/0 is announced by EIGRP (distance 90 )
instead of redistributing static.
I am unable to find any case/documentation that treats this.
Is ospf supposed to readvertise (while redistributing eigrp into sodf
) this default route or not ?
thanks
On 8/28/05, nenad pudar <nenad.pudar@gmail.com> wrote:
> redistributing router
> router eigrp 2
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 1544 2000 254 1 1500
> offset-list 5 in 100000 Serial0/0.3
> network 172.16.32.128 0.0.0.63
> no auto-summary
> no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
> !
> router ospf 1
> router-id 2.2.2.2
> log-adjacency-changes
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> redistribute eigrp 2 metric 20 metric-type 1 subnets
> network 172.16.32.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 172.16.32.65 0.0.0.0 area 10
> neighbor 172.16.32.4
> neighbor 172.16.32.5
>
> RTB-R2#sh ip route
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>
> Gateway of last resort is 172.16.32.130 to network 0.0.0.0
>
> 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 10 subnets, 3 masks
> C 172.16.32.128/26 is directly connected, Serial0/0.3
> C 172.16.32.0/26 is directly connected, Serial0/0.1
> O IA 172.16.33.0/30 [110/711] via 172.16.32.5, 1d01h, Serial0/0.1
> O IA 172.16.34.1/32 [110/648] via 172.16.32.4, 1d01h, Serial0/0.1
> D 172.16.31.1/32 [90/779936] via 172.16.32.130, 1d01h, Serial0/0.3
> C 172.16.32.64/26 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
> O IA 172.16.33.64/26 [110/712] via 172.16.32.5, 1d01h, Serial0/0.1
> O IA 172.16.34.64/26 [110/648] via 172.16.32.4, 1d01h, Serial0/0.1
> O IA 172.16.35.64/26 [110/648] via 172.16.32.5, 1d01h, Serial0/0.1
> D 172.16.31.64/26 [90/554496] via 172.16.32.130, 1d01h, Serial0/0.3
> D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/554496] via 172.16.32.130, 1d01h, Serial0/0.3
> RTB-R2#
> RTB-R2#
> RTB-R2#sh ip route 0.0.0.0
> Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet
> Known via "eigrp 2", distance 170, metric 554496, candidate default
> path, type external
> Redistributing via ospf 1, eigrp 2*******************************
> Last update from 172.16.32.130 on Serial0/0.3, 1d01h ago
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * 172.16.32.130, from 172.16.32.130, 1d01h ago, via Serial0/0.3
> Route metric is 554496, traffic share count is 1
> Total delay is 20100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 64102 Kbit
> Reliability 255/255,
>
> However I do not see this route on other ospf routers (I see all other
> eigrp routes)
> RTD-R4>en
> Password:
> RTD-R4#sh ip route
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 10 subnets, 3 masks
> O E1 172.16.32.128/26 [110/84] via 172.16.32.2, 1d01h, Serial0/0
> C 172.16.32.0/26 is directly connected, Serial0/0
> O IA 172.16.33.0/30 [110/128] via 172.16.32.5, 1d01h, Serial0/0
> C 172.16.34.1/32 is directly connected, Loopback0
> O E1 172.16.31.1/32 [110/84] via 172.16.32.2, 1d01h, Serial0/0
> O IA 172.16.32.64/26 [110/74] via 172.16.32.2, 1d01h, Serial0/0
> O IA 172.16.33.64/26 [110/129] via 172.16.32.5, 1d01h, Serial0/0
> C 172.16.34.64/26 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
> O IA 172.16.35.64/26 [110/65] via 172.16.32.5, 1d01h, Serial0/0
> O E1 172.16.31.64/26 [110/84] via 172.16.32.2, 1d01h, Serial0/0
>
>
> Im wondering what is wrong here.
>
> thanks
> nenad
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:20 GMT-3