From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Aug 25 2005 - 15:23:55 GMT-3
Sergio,
I'm just guessing but I suspect this problem might have something to do with
the fact you have a trunk between R2 and R3 instead of an etherchannel.
By having a trunk, spanning tree will block all but one of the physical
links.
Without more detail, I can't be certain but that's my thinking.
HTH, Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Sergio Jiminez A
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:39 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: PROBLEM WITH " Adv Router is not-reachable " OSPF DATABASE ROUTER
Hi Group,,,
I have the following problem: SOME OSPF ROUTES ARE IN THE DATABASE BUT NOT
IN THE IP ROUTING TABLE
Topology:
R1----L3-----R2------TRK/Dot1q--------R3-----L3-----R4
Each router has a int loopback 0, this is the router ID.
R2 and R3 run OSPF in four SVI. All routers are in AREA 0.
The problem is that R1 and R2 have the R4 IP Loopback 0(216.230.136.238) in
the database but not in the IP Routing table. R3 has the R4 IP Loopback 0
(216.230.136.238) in both. Also the subnet between R3 and R4 (/30) isn4t in
the routing table.
All routers have the same configuration,,,, Also R2, R3 and R4 has the
Loopbacks of R1.
I verified this document, but It doesn4t have the solution.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a008009481a
.shtml
I really appreciated your help,,,
Rgds,,,
Sergio Jiminez Arguedas.
COMMANDS applied in the routers:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:20 GMT-3