ISIS address rule question.

From: Stefan Grey (examplebrain@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 23 2005 - 11:27:31 GMT-3

• Next message: Capt.Spock: "BVI and routing..."
• Previous message: Brian Dennis: "RE: Dynamic access-list and lock and key issue"
• Next in thread: Héctor Fernández: "Re: ISIS address rule question."
• Maybe reply: Héctor Fernández: "Re: ISIS address rule question."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

There is a rule that the Net address should start and end with the same
octet. While doing different labs I can't uderstand it.

1. 3490.0001.0001.0006.00
2.490125.0001.0001.0006.00

Why the first address is incorrect. And to correspond to the rule above we
should use the address 00.3490.0001.0001.0006.00

But the second is correct. I just can't understand it event writing this
addresses in binary.

Could anybody explain?? thanks;)

• Next message: Capt.Spock: "BVI and routing..."
• Previous message: Brian Dennis: "RE: Dynamic access-list and lock and key issue"
• Next in thread: Héctor Fernández: "Re: ISIS address rule question."
• Maybe reply: Héctor Fernández: "Re: ISIS address rule question."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:20 GMT-3