From: Rohan Grover \(rohang\) (rohang@cisco.com)
Date: Wed Aug 17 2005 - 03:35:42 GMT-3
Sorry, my fuses blew out for this one. The problem was that isis was
over FR and I forgot to make the hub router the DR :-(
So there was no exchange of routes.
Thanks
Rohan
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
James Matrisciano
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 7:18 PM
To: Rohan Grover (rohang); ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: redistributing isis lvel-1 to level2
Redistribute connected? Please correct me if I am wrong, but even when
doing route leaking, do you not have to treat ISIS as like any other
routing protocol that is on the router?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Rohan Grover (rohang)
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 9:26 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: redistributing isis lvel-1 to level2
Hi,
On a router R1 with 2 isis processes( null and 100), I'm having trouble
redistributing the level-1 routes from process 100 into process null.
I have the folling config
R1
==========================
router isis
net 47.0200.0004.0004.0004.00
redistribute isis ip level-1 into level-2 distribute-list 100 !
router isis 100
net 47.0100.0004.0004.0004.00
is-type level-1
.
.
.
access-list 100 permit ip any any
========================
The L1 routes from process 100 go as L2 routes into a router R2 which
has the same net 47.0200 (even without redistribution)
However these L1 routes do not get redistributed into router R3 which
has a different area net 47.0300 (even with the redistribute statement)
What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks
Rohan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:19 GMT-3