From: marvin greenlee (marvin@ccbootcamp.com)
Date: Mon Aug 15 2005 - 18:29:27 GMT-3
"Per-VLAN RSTP is supported in Release 12.1(13)EA1 or later. When you enable
PVRST by using the spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst global configuration
command, RSTP is enabled."
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps646/products_configuration
_guide_chapter09186a008014f34d.html#wp1035485
Marvin Greenlee, CCIE#12237, CCSI# 30483
Network Learning Inc
marvin@ccbootcamp.com
www.ccbootcamp.com (Cisco Training)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Edwards, Andrew M
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 1:31 PM
To: robj; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: 3550 lab stp [bcc][faked-from][bayes]
Importance: Low
Rob,
Effectively these both do the same thing: rapid stp and uplinkfast.
However, I don't think the IOS for the 3550 support rapid stp yet.
My 2cents.
-----Original Message-----
From: robj [mailto:rob@warnerbeach.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 2:32 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: 3550 lab stp
If you have a question that states " configure the switch to unblock
immediately the redundant path in the event of a failure" The actual
answer was use the uplink fast option however In my opinion I felt that
rapid-pvst was not only quicker but also more efficient as it doesnt
cause all other intefaces to flood multicast packets everywhere for each
address learnt. It also appears to achieve the same desired result so
you could argue both are a valid solution
Appreciate anyones thoughts opinions?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:19 GMT-3