From: joshua lauer (jslauer@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Aug 06 2005 - 21:06:43 GMT-3
We have two bundles of 4 connecting our main campus to a secondary building,
and have a 1gb laser to back them both up but we are the govt and we are
anal so what I can I say :) I think one bundle of 4 is fine, bottom line is
how redundant do you really need to be and how much redundancy can you
afford?
JL
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Letterman (lletterm)" <lletterm@cisco.com>
To: <chon_mon@nym.hush.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 7:46 PM
Subject: RE: Real World Etherchannel
>I think two or more links in one etherchannel is good..
> We run ours that way..
>
>
>
> Larry Letterman
> INS-NW-WEST
> Cisco Systems
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> chon_mon@nym.hush.com
> Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 3:52 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OT: Real World Etherchannel
>
> After configuring Etherchannel between switches, is it common practice
> to have a backup solution if Etherchannel goes down? For example having
> two Etherchannels, one with a higher priority than the other? Or is it
> suffice to say that with several links bundled together, that is enough
> for redundancy.
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:18 GMT-3