RE: ftp acl

From: Ефременко
Date: Fri Aug 05 2005 - 13:45:46 GMT-3


Hi Raj

If we think about QoS we should think about shaping and policing. As I remember shaping works only on outbound basis. So, in this case first ACL will correct. But policing works on inbound also and the second ACL may be useful.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

---
Best regards,
Alexey

> -----Original Message----- > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > Rajib Khan > Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 7:17 PM > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com > Subject: ftp acl > > Hi Group > > I trying to find out correct ftp acl for QOS > > Out of 2 acls which one would be correct acl for ftp QOS > > 1. access 120 per tcp 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any eq ftp > > access 120 per tcp 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any eq ftp-data > > > or > > > 2. access 120 per tcp 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any eq ftp > access 120 per tcp 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any eq ftp-data > access 120 per tcp 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq ftp any > access 120 per tcp 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq ftp-data any > > > Thanks In advance > > Raj > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:18 GMT-3