From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Jul 29 2005 - 08:58:23 GMT-3
Andy,
There are a couple things you should know about this config:
1. The groups announced by the rp must be the same as the groups
allowed by the MA. So, yes, you need the filter on the rp.
2. You can't use a deny entry in the acl's.
3. The interval parameter isn't needed in this scenario.
HTH, Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 5:23 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Multicast / the multicast group (IEWB lab8)
Hi,
i'm doing task 7.3 -7.6 lab 8 in IEWB.
This states that R1 should anounce its loopback as a candidate RP via
Auto-rp
and R3 should map all multicast groups with event numbered first octet to
R1.
Ok, the question is clear enough and this is my answer:
R1:
!
interface Loopback0
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
!
ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 16
R3:
interface Loopback0
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
!
ip pim send-rp-discovery Loopback0 scope 16
!
ip pim rp-announce-filter rp-list R1_RP group-list R1_GROUPS
!
ip access-list standard R1_GROUPS
permit 224.0.0.0 14.255.255.255
!
ip access-list standard R1_RP
permit 150.1.1.1
!
And when looking at solution guide, i see this:
R3
!
interface Loopback0
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
!
ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 16 group-list 1 interval 5
!
access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0 254.255.255.255
R3:
interface Loopback0
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
!
ip pim send-rp-discovery Loopback0 scope 16
!
ip pim rp-announce-filter rp-list R1_RP group-list R1_GROUPS
!
ip access-list standard R1_GROUPS
permit 0.0.0.0 254.255.255.255
ip access-list standard R1_RP
permit 150.1.1.1
Ok, two things i want to clarify here are:
1- The access list that match multicast group.
permit 0.0.0.0 254.255.255.255 from SG
vs
permit 224.0.0.0 14.255.255.255 is mine.
I don't have a rack to test at the moment but i believe the two of them will
work fine. However, which one do you think will be prefered ? The acl that
match exactly the multicast score is "better", isn't it ?
2- Do we have to apply R1_Group to both RP in send-rp-annouce and MA in
rp-annouce-filter command ? or it's only needed to configure
rp-annouce-filter
on the mapping agent ? And there's no word about changing annouce interval,
why put interval 5 in there ?
Comments are welcome.
Andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:32 GMT-3