RE: Frame Question

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Jul 25 2005 - 13:00:52 GMT-3


Hi all,

This is a very interesting scenario and I like the proposed configuration.

However, isn't this config using dynamic arp to resolve the remote ip
address which, if so, violates the constraints of the original task?

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Sinclair
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 11:32 AM
To: Schulz, Dave; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Frame Question

Hi Dave,

Just labbed Amit's suggestion up. Note in config below that both VTs have
the
same IP address. It is a hack, but it works. Not sure if this is the
solution for your lab, but it is one solution.

interface Serial0/0
 description Determine Frame Interfaces based on requirement
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template102
 frame-relay interface-dlci 103 ppp Virtual-Template103
!
interface Virtual-Template102
 ip address 172.16.123.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Virtual-Template103
 ip address 172.16.123.1 255.255.255.0

HTH,

Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CCSI 30427, CISSP
www.netmasterclass.net

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Schulz, Dave
  To: Bob Sinclair
  Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 11:25 AM
  Subject: RE: Frame Question

  That requires that you use ppp, correct? These are on the same subnet and
I
only have a single ip address on the multipoint at R2.

  Dave Schulz, CCDP, CCNP, CCSP
  Project Manager / TAC Supervisor
  Data Processing Sciences Corporation
  10810 Kenwood Road
  Cincinnati, Ohio 45242
  Phone - (513) 791-7100 ext.7411
  Fax - (513) 791-4676
  Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-

  From: Bob Sinclair [mailto:bsinclair@netmasterclass.net]
  Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 11:22 AM
  To: Schulz, Dave
  Subject: Re: Frame Question

  Dave,

  Amit's solution looks like the ticket. If you can create two Virtual
Templates, each associated with a different PVC, then you will not need
mapping, since the VT is point-to-point. Addressing two VTs with the same
subnet/IP could be an issue, though.

  Bob Sinclair
  CCIE #10427, CCSI 30427, CISSP
  www.netmasterclass.net

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: Schulz, Dave

    To: Amit Jain ; Bob Sinclair ; ccielab@groupstudy.com

    Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 11:19 AM

    Subject: RE: Frame Question

    Does that require that you use PPP. How does this solve the mapping
    issue?

    Dave Schulz, CCDP, CCNP, CCSP
    Project Manager / TAC Supervisor
    Data Processing Sciences Corporation
    10810 Kenwood Road
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45242
    Phone - (513) 791-7100 ext.7411
    Fax - (513) 791-4676
    Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Amit Jain [mailto:netsteps@rediffmail.com]
    Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 11:03 AM
    To: Bob Sinclair; Schulz, Dave; ccielab@groupstudy.com
    Subject: Re: Frame Question

    If you are using two different subnets on both subints then you can use
    virtual templates and bind each VT to frame-relay interface-dlci
    command.

    Amit
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Bob Sinclair" <bsinclair@netmasterclass.net>
    To: "Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
    Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 8:26 PM
    Subject: Re: Frame Question

> Dave,
>
> Seems to me that if your frame-relay interface is multipoint (physical
    or
> subif), then mapping is required (either static or dynamic). If both
    static
> and dynamic mapping is ruled out, then you must use point-to-point
> subinterfaces. Does the scenario explicity rule out p-p subifs? Have
    you
> considered puttiing the same subnet on two p-p subifs?
>
> HTH,
>
> Bob Sinclair
> CCIE #10427, CCSI 30427, CISSP
> www.netmasterclass.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Schulz, Dave
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 10:46 AM
> Subject: Frame Question
>
>
> I have a lab question that has a multipoint frame terminating at R2
    with
> two DLCIs going to two different routers. You must disable inverse
    arp,
> and must use sub-interfaces. The last catch on this is ..... You
    cannot
> use the map statement. This makes it so you can only use the
> frame-relay interface-dlci command. However, this won't work for
> mapping to the IP address at each location. Any ideas on how to
    make
> this one work? Everything on the doc cd for static mapping on a
> multipoint requires map statements. Hmmmm.
>
>
> Dave Schulz,
> Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com <mailto:dschulz@dpsciences.com >
>
>
    _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
    _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:31 GMT-3