From: Brian Lee (ipgirl@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jul 24 2005 - 23:44:43 GMT-3
Hi group,
Could you explain why Nat is the issue, not Tunneling ?
Thanks
Lee.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shinji Kanehori" <kanehori@nttdocomo.co.jp>
To: "'Carlos G Mendioroz'" <tron@huapi.ba.ar>; "'McCallum, Robert'"
<robert.mccallum@thus.net>
Cc: <Xuan.Sun@Seagate.com>; "'Zachary Hinz'" <z_hinz@hotmail.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 11:01 PM
Subject: RE: BGP route by way of no BGP RTR
> NAT,MPLS,there is especially no problem.
> Gre tunnel is not perfect on this scenario.
>
> thank you all!!
>
>>>----Original Message Follows----
>>>From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
>>>Reply-To: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
>>>To: ???? <kanehori@nttdocomo.co.jp>
>>>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>>Subject: Re: BGP route by way of no BGP RTR
>>>>>Hi,group
>>>>>I$B!G(Bm in trouble about BGP routing. Scenario is following.
>>>>>R1-----------(ospf)--------R2-----------(eigrp)---------R3
>>>>>BGP<----------------------neighbor------------------>BGP
>>>>>R1,R2:OSPF
>>>>>R2,R3:EIGRP
>>>>>R1,R3:BGP
>>>>>In scenario ,redistributing is prohibited.
>>>>>R2 is not running bgp.
>>>>>If the protocol of between R2 and R3 is ospf,
>>>>>I would use tunneling and igp.but can$B!G(Bt $B!D(B
>>>>>Any idea ?
>>>>>
>>>>>____________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>__________
>>>
>>>>>_
>>>>>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
>>>
>>>materials from:
>>>
>>>>>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>>>>
>>>>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>--
>>>Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>>>
>>>______________________________________________________________
>>>_________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:31 GMT-3