From: JOHN MATHAI (john_t_mathai@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 21 2005 - 11:37:37 GMT-3
You need to redistributed connected also.
john t m
<br><br><br>>From: "Thunai Selvam (thunai)"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:30 GMT-3
<thunai@cisco.com><br>>Reply-To: "Thunai Selvam (thunai)"
<thunai@cisco.com><br>>To: "Thunai Selvam (thunai)"
<thunai@cisco.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com><br>>Subject: RE:
ISIS Redistribution Correction<br>>Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:25:44
+0530<br>><br>>Sorry on R3 as a Directly connected
routers..<br>><br>>-----Original Message-----<br>>From:
nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of<br>>Thunai Selvam (thunai)<br>>Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:20
PM<br>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com<br>>Subject: ISIS
Redistribution<br>><br>> Hai<br>> I have the following
scenario..<br>><br>> R1-----Ospf area 0
192.168.1.X----R2----ISIS<br>>192.168.2.X---R3----192.168.3.X<br>><br>><br>>
I redistribute ISIS routes on to ospf on R2 . I can see
192.168.3.X<br>>route on R1 however 192.168.2.X directly connected route
is not<br>>redistributing into ospf. I can see that route as an ISIS
route in R3.<br>><br>><br>>Can somebody help
me.<br>><br>><br>>Thanks<br>>Thunai<br>><br>>_______________________________________________________________________<br>>Subscription
information may be found
at:<br>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
information may be found
at:<br>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html