From: Lee Donald (Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk)
Date: Thu Jul 14 2005 - 04:55:20 GMT-3
Varthis,
That would defeat the object of doing the frag in the first place. The
purpose of the fragmentation is to chop up bigger packets so that the
smaller packets don't have to wait behind them, if you allow the bigger
packets to go through without the Frag, you might aswell not bother !!
Regards
Lee.
-----Original Message-----
From: Varthis Vassilantonakis [mailto:vvas@altec.gr]
Sent: 12 July 2005 21:31
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: frame-relay fragment issues
Hi group,
I have a FR connection 256kbps and I have configured a map-class like the
following:
map-class frame-relay FRTS
frame-relay cir 256000
frame-relay bc 32000
frame-relay mincir 192000
frame-relay fragment 320
Does the "frame-relay fragment 320" command under the above class issue a
320 bytes fragment for all traffic passing through the frame-relay interface
on which we assigned the class?
Is there any way to exclude a specific type of traffic (like ftp for
example) from the above fragmentation?
TIA
Varthis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:29 GMT-3