From: Godswill Oletu (oletu@inbox.lv)
Date: Tue Jul 12 2005 - 12:38:53 GMT-3
This should work fine:
router eigrp 1
redistribute connected route-map no-redistribute
!
access-list 1 permit 130.10.12.0
!
route-map no-redistribute permit 10
match ip address 1
R1#sh ip eigrp topology
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(130.10.12.1)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 130.10.12.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 128256
via Rconnected (128256/0)
R1#
---- Godswill Oletu----- Original Message ----- From: "Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 8:04 AM Subject: EIGRP Network Statements....excluding interfaces
> Team - > > Is there a way to do this.... > > R1 has two interfaces with 130.10.12.1/24 (BRI0) and 130.10.10.1/24 > (Fa0/0). > The BRI needs to be added to EIGRP, but not Fa0/0. You cannot specify an > inverse mask under EIGRP. How is this accomplished? (the goal is to > "show ip > eigrp topology" to only have the 130.10.12.0 in the table. Possible? > > I was first thinking using the passive-interface for Fa0/0, but this still > allows the Fa0/0 in the topology for eigrp. Or, using a redistribute > connected with a route map and only allowing the BRI. The issue is here if > you > do "network 130.10.12.1", eigrp always defaults to 130.10.0.0 and includes > both interfaces in the topology. Hmmmmm. > > Dave > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:29 GMT-3