From: Thomwin Chen (thomwin_chen@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Jul 12 2005 - 09:53:30 GMT-3
Hi Arun,
that will be converted to wildcard-mask format automatically...
Rack1R4(config-router)#network 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.252
Rack1R4(config-router)#do show run | be router eigrp
router eigrp 100
network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.3
no auto-summary
:)
Arun Arumuganainar <aarumuga@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi Dave
EIGRP supports both netmask and inverse mask statements .
For example, you could use network 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.252 or network
10.1.1.0 0.0.0.3
If inverse mask is not allowed I think you can use net mask format ( network
10.1.1.0 255.255.255.252 )
Hope this helps.
Thanks and Regards
Arun
----- Original Message -----
From: "Schulz, Dave"
To: "Spyros Kranis " ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 5:55 PM
Subject: RE: EIGRP Network Statements....excluding interfaces
> This is good...however, you specified the inverse mask in the network
> statement. Is there way to do this without the inverse mask and not
exclued
> the Fa0/0?
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spyros Kranis
> To: Schulz, Dave; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: 7/12/2005 8:13 AM
> Subject: RE: EIGRP Network Statements....excluding interfaces
>
> Dave,
> I think that you can issue the following that I labed it now:
> Note that I added to lo interfaces from 10.x.x.x network and
> Enable the eigrp protocol on one of them.
>
>
> R9#c
> Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
> R9(config)#int lo 99
> R9(config-if)#ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> R9(config-if)#int lo 100
> R9(config-if)#ip address 10.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
> R9(config-if)#^Z
> R9#c
> Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
> R9(config)#router ei 1
> R9(config-router)#no auto-summary
> R9(config-router)#network 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
> R9(config-router)#^Z
> R9#sh ip pro
> *Jul 12 12:00:21.774: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by
> console
> R9#sh ip pro
> R9#sh ip protocols
> Routing Protocol is "eigrp 1"
> Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
> Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
> Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
> Default networks accepted from incoming updates
> EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
> EIGRP maximum hopcount 100
> EIGRP maximum metric variance 1
> Redistributing: eigrp 1
> Automatic network summarization is not in effect
> Maximum path: 4
> Routing for Networks:
> 10.1.1.1/32
> Routing Information Sources:
> Gateway Distance Last Update
> Distance: internal 90 external 170
>
> R9#
>
> HTH
>
> Skra
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Schulz, Dave
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:05 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: EIGRP Network Statements....excluding interfaces
>
> Team -
>
> Is there a way to do this....
>
> R1 has two interfaces with 130.10.12.1/24 (BRI0) and 130.10.10.1/24
> (Fa0/0).
> The BRI needs to be added to EIGRP, but not Fa0/0. You cannot specify
> an
> inverse mask under EIGRP. How is this accomplished? (the goal is to
> "show
> ip
> eigrp topology" to only have the 130.10.12.0 in the table. Possible?
>
> I was first thinking using the passive-interface for Fa0/0, but this
> still
> allows the Fa0/0 in the topology for eigrp. Or, using a redistribute
> connected with a route map and only allowing the BRI. The issue is here
> if
> you
> do "network 130.10.12.1", eigrp always defaults to 130.10.0.0 and
> includes
> both interfaces in the topology. Hmmmmm.
>
> Dave
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:29 GMT-3