From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Tue Jul 12 2005 - 09:34:07 GMT-3
Thanks for the feedback.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomwin Chen
To: Schulz, Dave; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 7/12/2005 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: EIGRP Network Statements....excluding interfaces
Hi Dave,
I don't think it's possible.
the only thing i can think of is shutdown the Fa0/0 ? :)
I think, if the requirement is show ip eigrp top don't showed up in
another router, this is possible by using distribute-list out.
"Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
Team -
Is there a way to do this....
R1 has two interfaces with 130.10.12.1/24 (BRI0) and 130.10.10.1/24
(Fa0/0).
The BRI needs to be added to EIGRP, but not Fa0/0. You cannot specify an
inverse mask under EIGRP. How is this accomplished? (the goal is to
"show ip
eigrp topology" to only have the 130.10.12.0 in the table. Possible?
I was first thinking using the passive-interface for Fa0/0, but this
still
allows the Fa0/0 in the topology for eigrp. Or, using a redistribute
connected with a route map and only allowing the BRI. The issue is here
if you
do "network 130.10.12.1", eigrp always defaults to 130.10.0.0 and
includes
both interfaces in the topology. Hmmmmm.
Dave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:29 GMT-3