From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Tue Jul 12 2005 - 09:25:44 GMT-3
This is good...however, you specified the inverse mask in the network
statement. Is there way to do this without the inverse mask and not exclued
the Fa0/0?
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Spyros Kranis
To: Schulz, Dave; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 7/12/2005 8:13 AM
Subject: RE: EIGRP Network Statements....excluding interfaces
Dave,
I think that you can issue the following that I labed it now:
Note that I added to lo interfaces from 10.x.x.x network and
Enable the eigrp protocol on one of them.
R9#c
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
R9(config)#int lo 99
R9(config-if)#ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
R9(config-if)#int lo 100
R9(config-if)#ip address 10.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
R9(config-if)#^Z
R9#c
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
R9(config)#router ei 1
R9(config-router)#no auto-summary
R9(config-router)#network 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
R9(config-router)#^Z
R9#sh ip pro
*Jul 12 12:00:21.774: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by
console
R9#sh ip pro
R9#sh ip protocols
Routing Protocol is "eigrp 1"
Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
Default networks accepted from incoming updates
EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
EIGRP maximum hopcount 100
EIGRP maximum metric variance 1
Redistributing: eigrp 1
Automatic network summarization is not in effect
Maximum path: 4
Routing for Networks:
10.1.1.1/32
Routing Information Sources:
Gateway Distance Last Update
Distance: internal 90 external 170
R9#
HTH
Skra
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Schulz, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:05 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: EIGRP Network Statements....excluding interfaces
Team -
Is there a way to do this....
R1 has two interfaces with 130.10.12.1/24 (BRI0) and 130.10.10.1/24
(Fa0/0).
The BRI needs to be added to EIGRP, but not Fa0/0. You cannot specify
an
inverse mask under EIGRP. How is this accomplished? (the goal is to
"show
ip
eigrp topology" to only have the 130.10.12.0 in the table. Possible?
I was first thinking using the passive-interface for Fa0/0, but this
still
allows the Fa0/0 in the topology for eigrp. Or, using a redistribute
connected with a route map and only allowing the BRI. The issue is here
if
you
do "network 130.10.12.1", eigrp always defaults to 130.10.0.0 and
includes
both interfaces in the topology. Hmmmmm.
Dave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:29 GMT-3