From: Spyros Kranis (skranis@algosystems.gr)
Date: Tue Jul 12 2005 - 07:59:29 GMT-3
Maybe the offset is added to the already offset/metric that a route has -
plus the hopes ( 1 hop-if is directly connected ) to the router that
receives the route.
Am I correct?
TIA
Skra
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Spyros Kranis
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 1:37 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Rip issues - offset list
Hi group,
I found an issue regarding rip.
BB1 - R1 - R2
the question:
Configure R1 such that R2 would not advertise any networks to any of its
neighboring routers.
I thought that the following with an access-list should work
in order R2 to get routes with a metric of 15.
R1
Router rip
Offset-list 2 out 14 F0/0
Access-list 2............
But I found that the following is working with an offset of 13 at r1
in order R2 to get the routers with a metric of 15
R1
Router rip
Offset-list 2 out 13 F0/0.
Any thoughts?
TIA
Skra
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:29 GMT-3