From: George Red (cisc0day@yahoo.it)
Date: Mon Jul 11 2005 - 14:53:17 GMT-3
Sheikh, have you solved the problem about load balancing? ( see attached text).
TIA
George
--------------------------------------------------------
Yes it should because they have two separate next-hop values. Did you
try what I said with the "maximum-paths" command?
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sheikh Rahman [mailto:Sheikh.Rahman@uk.didata.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 2:16 PM
> To: Brian McGahan
> Subject: RE: eigrp equal cost load balance
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Will Eigrp load-balance between 2 neighbors through one interface. Let
> me expalin youmy network topology little more in detail.
>
> -- R2 OSPF
> Sw Eigrp ---- ----------- R1
> --- R3
>
>
> Sw, R2 and R3 e0 interface running eigrp and R2,R3's serial interface
> and R1 running OSPF
>
> OSPF and eigrp are being redistributed in R2 and R3. R1 (ospf) is able
> to load balance to prefixes learned from Eigrp. But Sw is not able to
> load balance prefixes learned from OSPF. When redistributed ospf route
> to eigrp metric was same on both router. R2 and R3 is using sw's vlan2
> interface.
>
> Not sure eigrp load balance between 2 neighbor through same interface
in
> this case sw will use vlan2 interface to communicate with the R2 and
R3
> router.
>
>
> Your help will be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sheikh
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:29 GMT-3