RE: Observations on passing the Service Provider lab

From: Mike Dickson (Mike@dicksonnetworks.com)
Date: Mon Jul 04 2005 - 11:42:32 GMT-3


Try the IOS Feature Navigator at
http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/CFN/jsp/index.jsp. You will need a CCO
login.

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Fady Boules [mailto:fady@synergyct.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 11:39 AM
To: Mike Dickson; comserv@groupstudy.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Observations on passing the Service Provider lab

Hi Mike,
first, congratulations for this grate achievement second, I need to know
which IOS can support all the AToM features in the
3725 router

Thanks
Fady

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Dickson" <Mike@dicksonnetworks.com>
To: <comserv@groupstudy.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 7:34 PM
Subject: RE: Observations on passing the Service Provider lab

>I don't work for an ISP, but I do work for a Cisco Gold Partner, so I
> get to work with lots of different kinds of Cisco technology on a
daily
> basis.
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacob Owen [mailto:jakeowen23@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 8:07 PM
> To: Mike Dickson; comserv@groupstudy.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Observations on passing the Service Provider lab
>
> Mike,
> First off, congrats on passing! I hope to pass on my first attempt in
> November.
>
> Now onto my question, do you think it is possible to pass the SP Lab
> without any Service Provider experience? I mean do you work for a
large
> ISP or anything? I have dedicated too much time and money in this to
> pull out now and hearing your answer may give someone with 0 ISP
> experience some hope! :) Thanks.
>
>
> --- Mike Dickson <Mike@dicksonnetworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Last Tuesday, I passed my Service Provider lab on my first attempt.
I
>
>> wanted to make a few observations about the experience, and
hopefully,
>
>> other will find these observations helpful.
>>
>> I used both the Hello Computers and IPExpert workbook as part of my
>> preparation. In my opinion, the fact that the Hello Computers
>> workbook is no longer for sale is a blessing in disguise. I found
>> their exercises to be repetitive, and the solutions to be literally
>> incomplete. By incomplete, I mean only half the configs were posted
>> on the web site. On the other hand, I found the IPExpert workbook to
>> be very helpful. Even though the current version is a bit long in
the
>
>> tooth, it still mapped well to the lab, and I think it did a good job
>> preparing me for the test.
>>
>> Secondly, I was very impressed with RTP. My other labs were taken at
>> San Jose, and I was a little nervous about RTP.
>> However, I found the
>> proctors at RTP to be extremely helpful and very open to questions.
>>
>> Finally, and I hope I'm not getting too close to violating the NDA,
>> but I found the SP test to be the first lab exam that seemed to be
>> more of a puzzle than a straight test about technology. The R&S and
>> Security labs seemed to be testing specific technical ways to
>> accomplish a task. The SP lab seemed focused on providing more
>> complicated tasks that forced me to figure out ways to combine
>> multiple technical steps to accomplish a task. The other tracks
>> seemed more focused on making me select the proper technique out of
>> many possible techniques through the wording of the requirement.
>>
>> Hope y'all find this helpful.
>>
>>
>> Mike Dickson
>> CCIE #12281 (Routing & Switching, Security, Service Provider),
>> MCSE+Internet, MCDBA
>>
>>
> _____________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/comserv.html
>>
>
>
> Jacob Owen - CCIE #14063 (R&S)
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Sports
> Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
> http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/comserv.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:29 GMT-3