RE: MSDP and MBGP question

From: Sheikh Rahman (Sheikh.Rahman@uk.didata.com)
Date: Thu Jun 30 2005 - 07:28:14 GMT-3

Next message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: OSPF Virtual Link and GRE tunnel."
Previous message: Tom Lijnse: "RE: TCP Intercept timeout"
Maybe in reply to: Montiean: "MSDP and MBGP question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi

Just following up on this topic. Do you think "ip msdp mesh-group" command is required while configuring basic MSDP with out bgp. In my lab it works with or without it, therefore not sure whether to keep this in the config or not.

Thanks

Sheikh

        -----Original Message-----
        From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Chris Lewis (chrlewis)
        Sent: Wed 29/06/2005 15:36
        To: Montiean; ccielab@groupstudy.com
        Cc:
        Subject: RE: MSDP and MBGP question

        MSDP will use BGP by default, the normal practice is to configure ip
        msdp default-peer A.B.C.D to identify the MSDP peeer and then the route
        to that peer can come from any routing method. AFAIK, this is the only
        thing to be concerned about with MSDP and BGP.

Chris

        -----Original Message-----
        From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
        Montiean
        Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 12:30 PM
        To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
        Subject: MSDP and MBGP question

        Hi,
          Per my understanding, when using multicast between diference domain
        like PIM-SM can consult RPF through unicast routing like BGP.
         If the question asking to use MSDP. Do we need to enable MBGP along
        through domains?
        I tested in my home lab. MSDP works without MBGP. Look like it is
        difference topic but I alway see it tied to each other when there 's
        topic in many books.
        Appreciated your help to shine on this.

--Montiean

        _______________________________________________________________________
        Subscription information may be found at:
        http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.

Although Dimension Data has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.

www.uk.didata.com
**********************************************************************

Next message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: OSPF Virtual Link and GRE tunnel."
Previous message: Tom Lijnse: "RE: TCP Intercept timeout"
Maybe in reply to: Montiean: "MSDP and MBGP question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:46 GMT-3