From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Wed Jun 29 2005 - 07:43:58 GMT-3
Pat,
Off-hand, I don't know the answer to your f/r q. I believe sub's inherit
encap from phy since you can specify encap within a fram map statement but
you can verify this with a little labbing.
Re: proprietary vs standard
HSRP vs VRRP
Tacacs vs radius
Stac vs ????
PagP vs Lacp
cmgp vs igmp snooping
There are probably lots more but these are the ones I could think of at the
moment.
HTH, Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Pat
Chui
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 1:48 AM
To: Group Study
Subject: pretend to work with non-cisco routers
All,
When asked to work with other vendors' routers, on Cisco routers, Do
you have to set frame-relay encapsulation type to ietf at both
interface level and pvc level? or setting it only at interface level
can take care of pvc level?
and other than F/R encapsulation, what other area you can think of?
like using 802.1q instead of isl, etc.
Appreciate your feedback,
Pat
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:45 GMT-3