From: Sila Moni (silamoni@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Jun 27 2005 - 12:50:44 GMT-3
Both LLC and TCP provide ack, with the exception that
LLC has less overhead.
--- Sam Joseph <samjoseph747@hotmail.com> wrote:
> if local ack is needed, use llc. No Local ack, use
> dlsw.
>
> >From: Lee Carter <l2carter@yahoo.com>
> >Reply-To: Lee Carter <l2carter@yahoo.com>
> >To: CCIE LAB <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: DLSW Direct Encapsulation - DLSW/LLC
> >Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >All,
> >
> >When doing DLSW over direct encapsulation
> >(frame-relay) link. When and why would you use DLSW
> or
> >LLC as part of your map statments?
> >
> >Also, does the LMI type determine anyting with
> this?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Lee
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> >http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:44 GMT-3