From: san (san.study@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 25 2005 - 15:49:52 GMT-3
Answer to question 1:
Yes it should be pingable.
L1 only router will have a default-route to reach the echo source
(assuming ping from L2 only Rtr).
L2 only router will have a L2 route to reach this L1 router. (because
it learnt via L2 neighbor).
Answer to Question 2:
I dont know
/SAN
On 6/25/05, John Matus <jmatus@pacbell.net> wrote:
> just trying to make sense of some things i've noticed with isis
> i know that level-1 areas act like stub areas, and level-2 areas act like
> transit areas.
> question 1: should you be able to ping from a level 2 area to a level 1
> router, if that router is NOT directly connected? e.g.- not a level-1-2
> router.
> question 2: if you have a router that belongs to 2 areas, does that mean that
> the router must be a level-1-2 or at least a level-2? i seem to remember an
> IE lab where there was a router <R6> that had a level-1 adjaceny to BB1 and a
> level-1-2 adjaceny to another router. is it possible for a router to have 2
> level-1 adjacenies to two different networks (and still pas on routing updates
> between them)? this lab i'm talking about had:
> BB1-----level-1 areaY--------R6--------level-2--areaZ-----------R3----
>
> and it was able to pass the routes from bb1 to r3 <if i remember at all
> correctly>
> just trying to get my facts straight.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John D. Matus
> MCSE, CCNP
> Office: 818-782-2061
> Cell: 818-430-8372
> jmatus@pacbell.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:44 GMT-3