From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Jun 24 2005 - 17:14:00 GMT-3
Logically and router-wise, it will not work.
50 = 00110010 as a binary number. Think back to everything from the CCNA
days. Subnetting is about drawing a line.
Everything on the left of the line is subnet, everything on the right of the
line is host.
Besides, the router will bitch:
emanon-R8(config-if)#ip address 172.16.26.49 255.255.50.0
Bad mask 0xFFFF3200 for address 172.16.26.49
emanon-R8(config-if)#
Things that make you go "Hmmmm...."
;)
Scott
PS. So that means it's bad practice AND impossible reality.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Darren Browning
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 4:02 PM
To: Godswill Oletu; Stewart, Dirk; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Subnet Question? Help
Although id agree it's a bad practice to have address 172.16.26.49
255.255.50.0
But this will work, this gives you 52,736 addresses range's are 172.16.18.0
- 172.16.223.255
Cheers
Daz
CCIE#7976
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Godswill Oletu
Sent: 24 June 2005 20:40
To: Stewart, Dirk; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Subnet Question? Help
it might be error, they likely meant 172.16.26.49/255.255.0.0
255.255.50.0 is a bad subnet mask.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stewart, Dirk" <Dirk.Stewart@co.fulton.ga.us>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 3:21 PM
Subject: Subnet Question? Help
> Is this a valid subnet and where and how would I use it. Does ISP use
> this kind of subnet.. If this is possible how much networks and host
> could I get from it...
>
> 172.16.26.49
>
> 255.255.50.0
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content for
> Fulton County by DefendMail, and is believed to be clean.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:43 GMT-3