From: George Cassels (glcassels3@nc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Jun 23 2005 - 08:48:12 GMT-3
George try putting the preempt on the master so when he comes back
online it will preempt the secondary.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
George Red
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 4:28 AM
To: Fellenbaum, John D; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: VRRP problem
John,
in the document that you indicated me it's said :
If preemption is disabled, the virtual router backup that is elected to
become virtual router master remains the master until the original
virtual router master recovers and becomes master again.
My problem is that even if the master router recovers, the backup router
remains master.
I think this behaviour is not correct.
HTH,
George
"Fellenbaum, John D" <john.d.fellenbaum@lmco.com> ha scritto:
George,
Check out the following document:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_guide_
chapter09186a008042fbd9.html
Look for the section about preemption and priority.
HTH,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
George Red
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 12:59 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: VRRP problem
Dear group,
i have a problem with vrrp.
I have two routers with the following configuration
Router A
interface fastethernet0/0
ip address 10.10.32.1 255.255.255.0
vrrp 1 ip 10.10.32.1
Router B
interface fastethernet0/0
ip address 10.10.32.2 255.255.255.0
vrrp 1 ip 10.10.32.1
Router A is the master; when i shut its fastethernet Router B becomes
master but when router A recovers, Router B remains master.
I expect instead that router A gets master again.
Can you help me with this problem?
Thanks in advance
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:42 GMT-3