Re: RE: MQC-Based FRTS

From: glcassels3 (glcassels3@nc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Jun 16 2005 - 23:14:54 GMT-3


Bob and Chris,

     Could the difference here be that in Chris's example the shaping is
done under the map-class and not a nested policy? This example leads me to
another question though. Is it best to do the shaping under a nested policy
config and then only used under a map-class frame-relay to affect only a
certain PVC, or perform the shaping under the map-class and only do the
bandwidth statements under the MQC?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:42 GMT-3