From: Zouta oxpf (zouta.oxpf@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jun 08 2005 - 09:40:39 GMT-3
If using VOIP, and the set fragment size is less than the average size
of the VOIP packets, they will always be fragmented.
Since no mention is made of the type of "voice", may be you can safely
use FRF.11C, (voice over FR). Being a layer 2 tech. they will not be
fragmented.
Use the vofr command under the interface-dlci
HTH
ZO
On 6/8/05, brussels <brussels@yandex.ru> wrote:
> Exactly not!
> You asked to configure pvc for defined fragment size, for instance 45.
> You are not informed about any kind of voice traffic, you only know that it is 'voice' ;)
>
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >You can set the fragment size to be larger than voice packet with its overhead, like this voice packet will not be fragmented.
> >
> > Command to be used under map-class to set the fragment size , frame-relay fragment <Size>
> >
> >Maybe this is what you are looking for.
> >
> >Yasser
> >brussels <brussels@yandex.ru> wrote:
> >There is some third unclear example.
> >
> >If you are asked to set up a frame-relay fragmentation on PVC, but voice packets should never be fragmented? What you'd like to do?
> >
> >There is no other clarification regarding 'voice'. And there is only one PVC.
> >
> >
> >>Brussels,
> >>
> >> How about using 1024000 for 1M (1024*1000) ?
> >>
> >>Regarding the 2nd question, does it ask you not to allow them to exceed these values or it asks you to allocate this bandwidth to them?
> >>
> >>It is different, if the question is asking you not to allow traffic to pass these values then it is asking for policing. Policing can be acheived either via rate-limit or via police command under modular QoS.
> >>
> >>If the question is asking to allocate them these values under congestion, that's to say guarantee these values - but they can exceed it if there is no congestion -, then the slution will be using the bandwidth command under modular QoS.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Yasser
> >>
> >>brussels
> >wrote:
> >>At first, when you asked to configure a bandwidth for class (either shaping or policing) at 1 Mbps, what should i use as argument to shape/police command? 1048574 (1024*1024 bps) or just 1000000?
> >>
> >>Second one;
> >>
> >>You asked to configure WRED on egress such, that the following two traffic classes alloted with their bandwidth
> >>
> >>class 1 - 512 kbps
> >>class 2 - 256 kbps
> >>
> >>and WRED for class-default traffic should be flow-based.
> >>
> >>What is the best configuration confirming to this rules?
> >>
> >>What is more preferable?
> >>
> >>int e0/0
> >>rate-limit group 100 512000 ...
> >>rate-limit group 101 256000 ...
> >>random-detect
> >>random-detect flow-based
> >>
> >>or
> >>
> >>MQC
> >>class1
> >>bandwidth 512
> >>random-detect
> >>class2
> >>bandwidth 256
> >>random-detect
> >>class-default
> >>fair-queue
> >>random-detect
> >>
> >>
> >>?
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________________________________
> >>Subscription information may be found at:
> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________________________________
> >>Subscription information may be found at:
> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >--
> >"sPAMOOBORONA" - PO^TA BEZ SPAMA W WA[EM OFISE! http://so.yandex.ru/
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> --
> "sPAMOOBORONA" - PO^TA BEZ SPAMA W WA[EM OFISE! http://so.yandex.ru/
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:41 GMT-3