From: Dave Bregman (Dave.Bregman@hillstone.com)
Date: Tue Jun 07 2005 - 22:57:41 GMT-3
I think I remember seeing a question similar to this somewhere.
Although I think it was something like, "Disable VTP and DTP on both
switches." I "thought" the solution was to set both of them to
Transparent and set each port to "switchport mode access". It was so
long ago, I don't remember what you were supposed to do with the fa0/23
- 24 ports, but I know there was at least one trunk between the two. I
think I statically defined the trunk so there was no DTP (switchport
mode trunk). Not sure if this was right or not as I didn't have access
to the answer.
FWIW,
Dave Bregman
CCIE #14626
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of T. N. Noble
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 4:52 AM
> To: 'Lee Donald'; 'Roy Dempsey'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: RE: VTP Question
>
>
> Hi..hi..hi..:-)
>
> Of course. Thanks for all who helped me in understanding it correctly.
>
> Regards,
>
> Noble
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Donald [mailto:Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk]
> Sent: 07 June 2005 14:52
> To: T. N. Noble; Lee Donald; 'Roy Dempsey'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: RE: VTP Question
>
> At least you got your answer though !!
>
> Regards
>
> Lee.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: T. N. Noble [mailto:noble@inserviceindia.com]
> Sent: 07 June 2005 12:46
> To: 'Lee Donald'; 'Roy Dempsey'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: RE: VTP Question
>
> OK. I agree to change the question to "Make sure VTP traffic
> is not sent out
> any fast ethernet ports"
>
> Thanks,
>
> Noble
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Donald [mailto:Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk]
> Sent: 07 June 2005 14:39
> To: T. N. Noble; Lee Donald; 'Roy Dempsey'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: RE: VTP Question
>
> Noble,
>
> That question isn't very clear either.
>
> How about:
>
> Make sure VTP frames aren't sent out of any port" ?
>
> Regards
>
> Lee.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: T. N. Noble [mailto:noble@inserviceindia.com]
> Sent: 07 June 2005 12:34
> To: 'Lee Donald'; 'Roy Dempsey'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: RE: VTP Question
>
> Hello,
>
> I understand that there is a confusion in my question itself.
> Let me put it
> like " VTP traffic should not be seen on all 24 fast Ethernet
> ports". Now
> how would you suggest..Transparent or Ver 3 or Pruning...
>
> Sorry for changing the question again....
>
> Thanks,
>
> Noble
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Lee
> Donald
> Sent: 07 June 2005 14:25
> To: Roy Dempsey; Cisco certification
> Subject: RE: VTP Question
>
> Roy, Brussels,
>
> I agree the question probably wanted VTP Transparent, however
> the question
> below said to "stop vtp traffic from reaching all 24 ports"
> VTP Transparent
> modes does not do that. In Transparent mode VTP Packets are
> recieved and
> forwarded.
>
> It depends on the question I suppose........... I agree there
> would be some
> sort of trunking between the 2 switches in the lab.
>
> Regards
>
> Lee.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roy Dempsey [mailto:roy.dempsey@gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 June 2005 11:43
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: VTP Question
>
> I see brussles has answered the question about transparent
> mode forwarding
> on VTP packets, so I would go with transparent mode.
>
> From the doc CD:
>
> Version-Dependent Transparent ModeIn VTP version 1, a VTP transparent
> network device inspects VTP messages for the domain name and
> version, and
> forwards a message only if the version and domain name match.
> Because only one domain is supported in the supervisor engine
> software, VTP
> version 2 forwards VTP messages in transparent mode, without
> checking the
> version.
>
> Good to know that about the different versions.
>
> Roy
>
> On 6/7/05, Roy Dempsey <roy.dempsey@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Lee,
> >
> > I think your solution would work. However, on a lab
> scenario, I think
> > its unlikely there would be no trunk between the switches.
> >
> > I'm not sure where this questions is from, but I think it
> *could* also
> > mean setting the switch to transparent mode, as this would stop the
> > switch from generating VTP packets.
> >
> > VTP packets received from other switches wouldn't be processed but
> > would be forwarded however, so I'm not 100% sure this would achieve
> > the required results.
> >
> > I would like to see this question in context to give a definitive
> > answer .i.e was there a requirement to configure trunk links etc.
> >
> > Regards
> > Roy
> >
> > On 6/7/05, Lee Donald <Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk> wrote:
> > > Noble,
> > >
> > > I would deduce from this question that it wants to change
> each port
> > > to "switchport Access" mode so that VTP frames are not
> sent out, by
> > > default
> all
> > > ports will be dynamic.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Lee.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: T. N. Noble [mailto:noble@inserviceindia.com]
> > > Sent: 07 June 2005 10:51
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: VTP Question
> > >
> > > Hello Group,
> > >
> > > Can anybody help me to understand the following question
> correctly?
> > >
> > > "Restrict the VTP Traffic from reaching all the 24 fast Ethernet
> > > ports
> of
> > > the switch". Is this question talking about VTP Pruning? I
> > > understand
> that
> > > the VTP pruning is related to Trunks where as here the
> switch ports
> > > are
> in
> > > Access Mode.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Noble
> > >
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Roy
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Roy
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:41 GMT-3