From: Yasser Aly (yaseraly00@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Jun 07 2005 - 15:35:26 GMT-3
Brussels,
How about using 1024000 for 1M (1024*1000) ?
Regarding the 2nd question, does it ask you not to allow them to exceed these values or it asks you to allocate this bandwidth to them?
It is different, if the question is asking you not to allow traffic to pass these values then it is asking for policing. Policing can be acheived either via rate-limit or via police command under modular QoS.
If the question is asking to allocate them these values under congestion, that's to say guarantee these values - but they can exceed it if there is no congestion -, then the slution will be using the bandwidth command under modular QoS.
Regards,
Yasser
brussels <brussels@yandex.ru> wrote:
At first, when you asked to configure a bandwidth for class (either shaping or policing) at 1 Mbps, what should i use as argument to shape/police command? 1048574 (1024*1024 bps) or just 1000000?
Second one;
You asked to configure WRED on egress such, that the following two traffic classes alloted with their bandwidth
class 1 - 512 kbps
class 2 - 256 kbps
and WRED for class-default traffic should be flow-based.
What is the best configuration confirming to this rules?
What is more preferable?
int e0/0
rate-limit group 100 512000 ...
rate-limit group 101 256000 ...
random-detect
random-detect flow-based
or
MQC
class1
bandwidth 512
random-detect
class2
bandwidth 256
random-detect
class-default
fair-queue
random-detect
?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:41 GMT-3