From: brussels (brussels@yandex.ru)
Date: Tue Jun 07 2005 - 08:42:50 GMT-3
Pruning is not VTP traffic. Pruning itself is a technique to reduce unknown broadcast traffic.
VTP V3 is a good solution, but the lab cat's software does not support V3. Transparent is not a solution, though this question is exactly about VTP Transparent. Right solution is to filter inbound all packets with DMAC 0100.0CCC.CCCC and NSAP 0x2003 on range fa0/1 - 24.
>Hello,
>
>I understand that there is a confusion in my question itself. Let me put it
>like " VTP traffic should not be seen on all 24 fast Ethernet ports". Now
>how would you suggest..Transparent or Ver 3 or Pruning...
>
>Sorry for changing the question again....
>
>Thanks,
>
>Noble
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Lee
>Donald
>Sent: 07 June 2005 14:25
>To: Roy Dempsey; Cisco certification
>Subject: RE: VTP Question
>
>Roy, Brussels,
>
>I agree the question probably wanted VTP Transparent, however the question
>below said to "stop vtp traffic from reaching all 24 ports" VTP Transparent
>modes does not do that. In Transparent mode VTP Packets are recieved and
>forwarded.
>
>It depends on the question I suppose........... I agree there would be some
>sort of trunking between the 2 switches in the lab.
>
>Regards
>
>Lee.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Roy Dempsey [mailto:roy.dempsey@gmail.com]
>Sent: 07 June 2005 11:43
>To: Cisco certification
>Subject: Re: VTP Question
>
>I see brussles has answered the question about transparent mode forwarding
>on VTP packets, so I would go with transparent mode.
>
>From the doc CD:
>
>Version-Dependent Transparent ModeIn VTP version 1, a VTP transparent
>network device inspects VTP messages for the domain name and version, and
>forwards a message only if the version and domain name match.
>Because only one domain is supported in the supervisor engine software, VTP
>version 2 forwards VTP messages in transparent mode, without checking the
>version.
>
>Good to know that about the different versions.
>
>Roy
>
>On 6/7/05, Roy Dempsey <roy.dempsey@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Lee,
>>
>> I think your solution would work. However, on a lab scenario, I think
>> its unlikely there would be no trunk between the switches.
>>
>> I'm not sure where this questions is from, but I think it *could* also
>> mean setting the switch to transparent mode, as this would stop the
>> switch from generating VTP packets.
>>
>> VTP packets received from other switches wouldn't be processed but
>> would be forwarded however, so I'm not 100% sure this would achieve
>> the required results.
>>
>> I would like to see this question in context to give a definitive
>> answer .i.e was there a requirement to configure trunk links etc.
>>
>> Regards
>> Roy
>>
>> On 6/7/05, Lee Donald <Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk> wrote:
>> > Noble,
>> >
>> > I would deduce from this question that it wants to change each port
>> > to "switchport Access" mode so that VTP frames are not sent out, by
>> > default
>all
>> > ports will be dynamic.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Lee.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: T. N. Noble [mailto:noble@inserviceindia.com]
>> > Sent: 07 June 2005 10:51
>> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > Subject: VTP Question
>> >
>> > Hello Group,
>> >
>> > Can anybody help me to understand the following question correctly?
>> >
>> > "Restrict the VTP Traffic from reaching all the 24 fast Ethernet
>> > ports
>of
>> > the switch". Is this question talking about VTP Pruning? I
>> > understand
>that
>> > the VTP pruning is related to Trunks where as here the switch ports
>> > are
>in
>> > Access Mode.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Noble
>> >
>> > ____________________________________________________________________
>> > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> > ____________________________________________________________________
>> > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Roy
>>
>
>
>--
>Regards,
>Roy
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
-- qNDEKS.pO^TA: OB_EM PO^TOWOGO Q]IKA NE OGRANI^EN! http://mail.yandex.ru/monitoring/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:41 GMT-3