From: Roy Dempsey (roy.dempsey@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jun 07 2005 - 07:29:44 GMT-3
Lee,
I think your solution would work. However, on a lab scenario, I think
its unlikely there would be no trunk between the switches.
I'm not sure where this questions is from, but I think it *could* also
mean setting the switch to transparent mode, as this would stop the
switch from generating VTP packets.
VTP packets received from other switches wouldn't be processed but
would be forwarded however, so I'm not 100% sure this would achieve
the required results.
I would like to see this question in context to give a definitive
answer .i.e was there a requirement to configure trunk links etc.
Regards
Roy
On 6/7/05, Lee Donald <Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk> wrote:
> Noble,
>
> I would deduce from this question that it wants to change each port to
> "switchport Access" mode so that VTP frames are not sent out, by default all
> ports will be dynamic.
>
> Regards
>
> Lee.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: T. N. Noble [mailto:noble@inserviceindia.com]
> Sent: 07 June 2005 10:51
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: VTP Question
>
> Hello Group,
>
> Can anybody help me to understand the following question correctly?
>
> "Restrict the VTP Traffic from reaching all the 24 fast Ethernet ports of
> the switch". Is this question talking about VTP Pruning? I understand that
> the VTP pruning is related to Trunks where as here the switch ports are in
> Access Mode.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Noble
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Regards, Roy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:41 GMT-3