From: Lee Donald (Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jun 07 2005 - 05:19:43 GMT-3
Sheikh,
You have policed the interface but you have chosen CB and not CAR. CAR is
configured using the rate-limit command on the interface. It depends how the
question was phased but if it specified CAR, then I would have gone for
rate-limit.
Regards
Lee.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sheikh Rahman [mailto:Sheikh.Rahman@uk.didata.com]
Sent: 07 June 2005 09:11
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: FW: policing with MQC
Hi There,
Can any one please help regarding this config as I have received 0% in
qos. Question was about configuring CAR with below senario, I don't know
what I have done wrong here. You help will be highly appreciated.
Think of a Scenario, where all ftp traffic has 3Mb and 150 kps burst
and 200 kbps is total burst
All other traffic 2mb 300kbps burst and 400 total burst.
Following is my config.
class-map ftp
match access-group 101 - --- CEF wasn't allowed to configure
Police-map ftp
class ftp
police police 3000000 18750 6250
class class-default
police 2000000 37500 12500
int s0/0
service-policy output ftp
access-list 101 per tcp any any eq ftp
access-list 101 per tcp any any eq ftp-data
Is above configuration right?
Thanks in advance
Haf
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
Although Dimension Data has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no
viruses
are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any
loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
www.uk.didata.com
**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:41 GMT-3