From: Sean C (Upp_and_Upp@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 06 2005 - 15:57:20 GMT-3
Hi Gladstone,
Your sir is from R1,
> Rack2R1#sir 200.200.5.1
> % Network not in table
Yet NAT is applied to R5. Does R5 at least have the static /32? Per the
document you site, the router doing the NAT should have a static /32 applied
and then it's up to you to redistribute. So, not knowing if/how R5 is
advertising it's routes to R1, does R5 at least have the /32 in it's RIB?
HTH,
Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: <gladston@br.ibm.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:15 PM
Subject: Add-route keyword
> Add-route keyword on ip nat outside list is not working.
>
> Can you see any problem on the config?
>
> I am using the example located at
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/1.html
> but the router simply does not add the route.
>
> Rack2R5#sh ip nat tra
> Pro Inside global Inside local Outside local Outside
> global
> --- --- --- 200.200.5.1 142.20.66.1
> --- 142.20.1.1 142.20.1.1 200.200.5.1 142.20.66.1
> Rack2R5#
> Rack2R5#sh run int e 0/0
> Building configuration...
>
> Rack2R5#sh run int e 1/0
> interface Ethernet1/0
> ip address 142.20.65.5 255.255.255.0
> ip nat outside
> service-policy output Premium-gold-normal
> ip policy route-map Avoid-BRI
> half-duplex
> end
>
> Rack2R5#sh run int s 0/0
> Building configuration...
>
> interface Serial0/0
> bandwidth 64
> ip address 142.20.125.5 255.255.255.224
> ip nat inside
> ip pim nbma-mode
> ip pim sparse-dense-mode
> ip multicast boundary 50
> ip multicast helper-map 229.1.1.1 142.20.56.255 111
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip ospf authentication-key cisco
> ip igmp join-group 229.1.1.1
> no fair-queue
> cdp enable
> end
>
> Rack2R5#sh run | i nat
>
> ip nat pool Nat-pool 200.200.5.1 200.200.5.10 prefix-length 24
> ip nat outside source list 2 pool Nat-pool add-route
>
> Rack2R5#sh access-list 2
> Standard IP access list 2
> 10 permit 142.20.66.1 (3 matches)
> Rack2R5#
>
> Nat is being done:
>
> *Mar 1 00:20:34: NAT*: s=142.20.66.1->200.200.5.1, d=142.20.1.1 [478]
> Rack2R5#
> *Mar 1 00:20:36: NAT*: s=142.20.66.1->200.200.5.1, d=142.20.1.1 [479]
> Rack2R5#
> *Mar 1 00:20:38: NAT*: s=142.20.66.1->200.200.5.1, d=142.20.1.1 [480]
> Rack2R5#
> *Mar 1 00:20:40: NAT*: s=142.20.66.1->200.200.5.1, d=142.20.1.1 [481]
> Rack2R5#
>
> Traffic is reaching the far end node:
>
> *Mar 1 06:30:04: IP: s=142.20.14.4 (Serial0/0.14), d=224.0.0.5, len 120,
> rcvd 0
> Rack2R1#no
> *Mar 1 06:30:06: IP: s=142.20.125.1 (local), d=224.0.0.13
> (Serial0/0.125), len 54, sending broad/multicast
> *Mar 1 06:30:06: IP: s=200.200.5.1 (Serial0/0.125), d=142.20.1.1, len
> 100, rcvd 4
> *Mar 1 06:30:06: IP: s=142.20.1.1 (local), d=200.200.5.1 (Serial0/0.125),
> len 100, sending
>
> But the route used by nat is not added to RIB. I reset the router:
>
> Rack2R1#sir 200.200.5.1
> % Network not in table
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:41 GMT-3